In 2009, during all2gethernow a panel of people fom business, culture, and law talked on this issue. Result was an open one... yet most panelists agreed that changes would have to happen, in particular at Collecting Societies.
A high tension causes massive pressure on Collecting Societies to adapt new ideas. There certainly is a risk of missing a step.
Now, one year after - what exactly has changed? Did any collection society embrace CreativeCommons? Is there more transparence in GEMA's licensing fees? Is there room for FairUse in Europe?
What about the future? What do you expect? Are there any plans? Do you expect other, new Collecting Societies to come up?
Finally, which services does the ideal collection society offer and provide to members, licencees, and fans?
This session is not focused on the issue of Creative Commons NC (Non Commercial) licences not being defined exactly enough to allow for exploitation by standards.
It's about the issues that artists are fighting when trying to make money from Creative Commons content.
Or is it just like, CC vs. Money - that's a paradox?
Why not deciding to license under Creative Commons so that you can decide yourself as an artist and composer whom to license to? Why does it represent a much more challenging task than to license with existing collecting societies?
Which ways are there to earn money with Creative Commons licences? What are the constraints? What can be done about it?
